by Meredith O'Brien
This is not a column about Michelle Obama’s bare arms. God no. It’s not going to prattle on about her clothes and shoes either because, frankly I don’t really care what the First Lady wears.
I do, however, care about this Michelle-O-mania that’s been going on lately. While the bulk of the media are busy reporting on the public’s seething outrage over federally-funded bonuses for people who tanked their companies, there are plenty of others dissecting everything the First Lady does, wears and eats and then scrounges around trying to assign meaning and message to everything. There’s a new story almost every day about Obama, whether it’s about her visit to a Washington, D.C. school or starting a vegetable garden, meeting with soldiers and their families or about the fact that she had her official White House portrait taken while wearing a scandalously sleeveless dress. Over the past two weeks, Obama’s image was on the cover of no less than four major magazines: Vogue , O , New York  and the New Yorker . Looking at the avalanche of attention to the minutiae of Michelle, I started to worry that the media were overanalyzing her and providing such mammoth coverage that it’d provoke a backlash, that she’d become overexposed.
Continue reading in Working Moms in Pop Culture and Politics...