The SAT Cheating Scandal - What the %$@#?

By Abby Margolis Newman

 

As a parent of a high school senior and a junior, I am both fascinated and horrified by the SAT cheating scandal that was recently discovered on Long Island.

 

In case you haven't seen it in the news, last month six students at Great Neck North High School were arrested for allegedly each paying Samuel Eshaghoff (a graduate of the high school and now a senior at Emory University) $2,500 to take the SAT in their place.

 

In the weeks that followed, the “sting operation” widened, resulting in a total of 20 arrests of young people from Great Neck North and four other schools. The accused included current Long Island high school students and several college students who were paid up to $3,500 to take the test for them.

 

In the six articles I found on this topic in The New York Times, plenty of ink was spent on school officials’ and local politicians’ castigation of the College Board and the Educational Testing Service (which administers the SAT). The principal of Great Neck North, Bernard Kaplan, said, “The procedures ETS uses to give the test are grossly inadequate in terms of security.” Probably true. He went on to describe cheating on the SAT as “inevitable.”

 

State Senator Kenneth P. LaValle added, “Sadly, the losers in this are the honest, hard-working students who play by the rules: they prepare for this like the Super Bowl.” Also true, if completely warped - why has a test been infused with this kind of life-and-death importance? The Super Bowl? Going through the college application process for the first time with our oldest son, I have seen up-close the hysteria the SAT can create in some circles; this could be another article in itself.

 

But back to the SAT cheating scandal. Administrators, school board officials and politicians rushed to blame the College Board and the ETS. Parents, meanwhile, were eager to lash out at school administrators: Superintendent Geoffrey Gordon of the Port Washington schools said that when he needed to verify a student’s identity at one SAT exam, the mother “chewed my head off.”

 

In the stampede to blame the school administrators and the College Board - who no doubt bear some responsibility and clearly need to improve the security surrounding such high-stakes tests - I can’t help wondering about the cheating students themselves and their parents.

 

Who are these cheating kids? What 17-year-old would get into his or her head that the best way to deal with the pressure of taking the SAT is by having someone else do it for you? It would no sooner occur to me nor any of my three boys to pay someone else to take a test in their place than it would to rob a bank. (Just to be clear, it would not occur to us in a million years to rob a bank.)

 

And more importantly, what about the parents? Someone has planted the notion in the heads of these cheating kids that the result of the SAT is so life-altering, so central to their future trajectory in life, that they need to succeed at all costs - and I don’t just mean the $3,500. I’m talking about the complete abdication of their moral compasses.

 

dmayer77
07.27.12

Good work! I always like to leave comments whenever I see something unusual or impressive. I think we must appreciate those who do something especial. Keep it up, thanks
David Mayer
glasögon

abbynewman
12.03.11

It is true, zenmom, that we "pay people every day to do jobs we cannot." The difference is that we are not then representing their work as our own. That's where it becomes dishonest, and cheating.

zenmom
12.02.11

Cheating is wrong and they are just cheating themselves. However....let me propose an idea, and feel free to flame me at will. I also wonder where they came up with that kind of money (parents??). However, in the 'real world' we surround ourselves with people with greater skills than ours to manage things we cannot do...in an effort to be more productive and a better professional. We pay people everyday to do jobs we cannot. While I do not condone cheating of any magnitude, this is sort of an innovative and creative way to beat a system that is clearly flawed. Changes will be made whether they are in the form of security or the system rethinking it's current system of testing.